Topic: Ferries
|
WorldSavior |
Posted at:
2020-04-09, 21:37 UTC+2.0
Even when you set maximum length to 250? Okay, better don't try with such a high number...
20 is not that high. In my case it was 99 or something like that. But 20 could be a better limit than 10.
Not really. The performance requirements grow at least quadratic in dependence of the maximum length.
Not sure. I usually press "W" in every game, so I'd have to press it over and over again if I would build waterways... Reducing the maximum length might do the trick. Wanted to save the world, then I got widetracked
Top
Quote
|
|
Nordfriese Topic Opener |
Posted at:
2020-04-09, 21:43 UTC+2.0
Well 99 is really a bit… enourmous Perhaps restricting the WW max length spinbox in the editor to force map designers not to go above a reasonable limit value like perhaps 30 should do the trick?
Edited:
2020-04-09, 21:43 UTC+2.0
Top
Quote
|
|
WorldSavior |
Posted at:
2020-04-11, 21:04 UTC+2.0
Exactly that's why we need an upper limit.
That's what I suggested. But even 30 might be too high, what about 20 instead? Wanted to save the world, then I got widetracked
Top
Quote
|
|
Nordfriese Topic Opener |
Posted at:
2020-04-11, 21:29 UTC+2.0
Okay
Top
Quote
|


But a) that's not really what ferries are intended for and b) why on earth would you want to build a 99 tiles long waterway??