Topic: making farmers consistent

Forums » Player Forums » Game Suggestions » making farmers consistent
GunChleoc
Avatar
Joined: 2013-10-07, 15:56 UTC+2.0
Posts: 3317
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: RenderedRect
Posted at: 2020-02-26, 21:49 UTC+1.0

But then the result would look like this:

Field on shore

Edited: 2020-02-26, 21:49 UTC+1.0
Attachment: image/png
field_on_shore.png

Busy indexing nil values

Top Quote
WorldSavior
Avatar
Joined: 2016-10-15, 04:10 UTC+2.0
Posts: 2146
OS: Linux
Version: Recent tournament version
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: Germany
Posted at: 2020-02-28, 00:05 UTC+1.0

Yes, but water at the coast is very shallow, everyone can walk through it without sinking face-wink.png

Wanted to save the world, then I got widetracked

Top Quote
hessenfarmer
Avatar
Topic Opener
Joined: 2014-12-11, 23:16 UTC+1.0
Posts: 2832
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: Bavaria
Posted at: 2020-02-28, 10:27 UTC+1.0

Well, Wheat doesn't grow well in shallow waters, as does not barley. So the idea is to treat all tribes the same. By this atlanteans would loose a light advantage by loosing the shore and the other tribes would gain some spots if buildings were placed to close.
Should be no big deal even on fjords or on archipielago sea as otherwise they would only be playable with atlanteans only which is not the case I believe

It would make a nice idea to have a tribe that plants rice though which needs exactly a spot on the shore

Top Quote
stonerl
Avatar
Joined: 2018-07-30, 00:03 UTC+2.0
Posts: 327
Ranking
Tribe Member
 Posted at: 2020-02-28, 11:06 UTC+1.0

hessenfarmer wrote:

Well, Wheat doesn't grow well in shallow waters, as does not barley. So the idea is to treat all tribes the same. By this atlanteans would loose a light advantage by loosing the shore and the other tribes would gain some spots if buildings were placed to close.

+1

Should be no big deal even on fjords or on archipielago sea as otherwise they would only be playable with atlanteans only which is not the case I believe

It isn't, I played those maps many times with barbarians and had no problems whatsoever.

It would make a nice idea to have a tribe that plants rice though which needs exactly a spot on the shore

It would be indeed.

Top Quote
GunChleoc
Avatar
Joined: 2013-10-07, 15:56 UTC+2.0
Posts: 3317
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: RenderedRect
Posted at: 2020-02-28, 20:26 UTC+1.0

hessenfarmer wrote:

So as this thread diverted from the original question. I propose to implement the solution that Nordfriese suggested. (using maxcaps allowing to plant between buildings but not at the shore) this would improve the current situation for all tribes except atlanteans and only worsen atlanteans capabilites as they can't plant at shores anymore.
Any objections?

+1 from me too, let's try the maxcaps solution.

Busy indexing nil values

Top Quote
hessenfarmer
Avatar
Topic Opener
Joined: 2014-12-11, 23:16 UTC+1.0
Posts: 2832
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: Bavaria
Posted at: 2020-03-09, 14:11 UTC+1.0

Ok maxcaps solution with consistency between tribes is now implemented

Top Quote
WorldSavior
Avatar
Joined: 2016-10-15, 04:10 UTC+2.0
Posts: 2146
OS: Linux
Version: Recent tournament version
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: Germany
Posted at: 2020-03-09, 19:22 UTC+1.0

Atlanteans cannot plant fields at the shore anymore? Well, whatever : (

stonerl wrote:

Should be no big deal even on fjords or on archipielago sea as otherwise they would only be playable with atlanteans only which is not the case I believe

It isn't, I played those maps many times with barbarians and had no problems whatsoever.

But now barbarian farmers require one additional field face-wink.png

Wanted to save the world, then I got widetracked

Top Quote