Topic: poor hamlet start for amazons
the-x
Joined:
2019-01-19, 13:23 UTC+1.0
Posts: 967  One Elder of Players |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 19:46 UTC+2.0
The question was not meant as an ideological one ;D more in the sense of gameplay. The absolute minimum makes you to "must" build the exactly same buildings in a row. yes, maybe 2, 3 woodcutters would be too much but I'd stll prefer choices in economy from a very little start. 
Top
Quote
|
|
JanO
Joined:
2015-08-02, 11:56 UTC+2.0
Posts: 179  At home in WL-forums |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 21:14 UTC+2.0
Simply no. If you want to ask the question for gameplay, just pick another start condition. This one is clearly defined and represents a consecutive cornercase. If it would be changed, it would be only a matter of (short) time until someone would ask for this again. Even without knowing that this has already been existing.
Top
Quote
|
|
the-x
Joined:
2019-01-19, 13:23 UTC+1.0
Posts: 967 One Elder of Players |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 21:23 UTC+2.0
Simply no, as the question is about the gameplay
Edited:
2020-04-28, 00:27 UTC+2.0
Top
Quote
|
Nordfriese
Joined:
2017-01-17, 18:07 UTC+1.0
Posts: 2137 OS: Debian Testing Version: Latest master One Elder of Players Location: 0x55555d3a34c0 |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 21:27 UTC+2.0
If you want something that is hardcode but offers more than one way to solve, just play Discovery with 3 colonies. The point of Poor Hamlet is that it gives players the absolute minimum needed to start an economy. If there is even 1 ware or worker that could be removed from the starting condition, it should be removed. That's what a minimal start is all about.
Top
Quote
|
|
hessenfarmer
Joined:
2014-12-11, 23:16 UTC+1.0
Posts: 2828 One Elder of Players Location: Bavaria |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 21:54 UTC+2.0
pushed poor_hamlet and struggling_outpost startconditions for amazons. Still we need village, fortified village, trading outpost, discovery and new world.
Top
Quote
|