Topic: poor hamlet start for amazons
king_of_nowhere![]() Topic Opener |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 15:37 UTC+2.0
I calculated what it would take for anyone wanting to implement it: 4 logs 1 rubber 1 felling ax 1 machete 1 pick 1 showel 2 hammers 1 chisel ![]() ![]() |
hessenfarmer![]() |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 16:00 UTC+2.0
Great, We need 2 more values I think. If you would be so kind to calculate this I would add this tonight to the branch. ![]() ![]() |
king_of_nowhere![]() Topic Opener |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 16:22 UTC+2.0
huh. i had no idea the game had some calculations of the sort. so, what should i take as reference for those values? the cost for a patrol post to expand the border and reach those trees/stones, or the cost for a junglemaster? ![]() ![]() |
hessenfarmer![]() |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 17:00 UTC+2.0
the cost to get the ecoomy kickstarted to being able to expand. Dismatle return for patrol post should be considered. ![]() ![]() |
king_of_nowhere![]() Topic Opener |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 17:05 UTC+2.0
in case no wood, we need only a junglepreserver (3 logs, 1 rope) in case no stone, we need patrol posts, which cost 1 wood, 1 rope, 1 stone. the wood is achieved with the woodcutter, the rope must be given. dismantling gives the stone back, so in case of no stone they need exactly 1 stone and as many ropes as they need patrol posts ![]() ![]() |
hessenfarmer![]() |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 17:08 UTC+2.0
how much stone do we need to build a ropemaker and liana cutter? ![]() ![]() |
king_of_nowhere![]() Topic Opener |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 17:32 UTC+2.0
rope weaver: 2 stone, 5 logs, 1 rubber liana cutter: 5 logs so, giving 3 stones so one can make his own rope weaver (or 2 stones, one make rope weaver, make ropes, then dismantles) is possible ![]() ![]() |
hessenfarmer![]() |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 17:38 UTC+2.0
ok, will do that. For the struggling outpost I will just multiply the values given by the same factor we did for the other tribes. ![]() ![]() |
the-x![]() |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 19:02 UTC+2.0
Sounds okay, maybe we should also ask the others? One general question is does it makes sence to reduce it exactly to the minimum (like I prefer two / three woodcutters but not as many as the other conditions) ![]() ![]() |
JanO![]() |
Posted at:
2020-04-27, 19:17 UTC+2.0
Yes it makes sense to reduce it to the absolute minimum. This is precisely the concept of this starting condition! ![]() ![]() |