Topic: News about AI
|
Tibor Topic Opener
Joined:
2009-03-23, 23:24 UTC+1.0
Posts: 1377  One Elder of Players Location: Slovakia |
Posted at:
2017-08-24, 21:42 UTC+2.0
Already included.... 
Top
Quote
|
GunChleoc
Joined:
2013-10-07, 15:56 UTC+2.0
Posts: 3317 One Elder of Players Location: RenderedRect |
Posted at:
2017-08-25, 09:02 UTC+2.0
Fixed. Replaced a Busy indexing nil values
Top
Quote
|
|
Tibor Topic Opener
Joined:
2009-03-23, 23:24 UTC+1.0
Posts: 1377 One Elder of Players Location: Slovakia |
Posted at:
2017-08-25, 09:30 UTC+2.0
Thanks Compiler usually suggest that perhpas "->" should be there, but obviously not this time...
Top
Quote
|
|
GunChleoc
Joined:
2013-10-07, 15:56 UTC+2.0
Posts: 3317 One Elder of Players Location: RenderedRect |
Posted at:
2017-08-26, 08:37 UTC+2.0
That's because of the Busy indexing nil values
Top
Quote
|
|
teppo
Joined:
2012-01-30, 09:42 UTC+1.0
Posts: 425  Tribe Member |
Posted at:
2017-08-26, 12:55 UTC+2.0
I recently played "Anchor", a single player vs. AI map. The yellow player happened to be Empire. The map kind-of failed: The yellow was supposed to make my life difficult at the beginning, but it ended building the border full of single-soldier huts, and therefore was not able to attack when I was fragile. In my mind, the AI empire used to mostly build the small two-soldier huts in the old days. From this point of view, the AI of BZR8433 performed worse than the latest release.
Top
Quote
|
Nordfriese
Joined:
2017-01-17, 18:07 UTC+1.0
Posts: 2183 OS: Debian Testing Version: Latest master One Elder of Players Location: 0x55555d3a34c0 |
Posted at:
2017-08-26, 14:17 UTC+2.0
This problem can be solved just by training. Empire AI is weak in early game because it prefers blockhouses to sentries, but in quick-fight empire-only training rounds I often see one or two AIs that preferably build sentries, and those are the ones that win and get selected. The new trainingsite algorithm works great, barbarians have improved a lot, atlanteans are much stronger as well. No significant change for empire, which was already the best; the AI now trains its soldiers equally well with all three tribes. A while ago I commented on the fact that barbarians like to enhance all metalworkshops and run out of tools. This changed significantly now: In the last training round, I selected an AI that was outstanding at training its soldiers (3 times faster than the other AIs) and had a good infrastructure, but it wasn´t a perfect choice: How many metalworkshops did the black player build? I counted 43…
Top
Quote
|
WorldSavior
Joined:
2016-10-15, 04:10 UTC+2.0
Posts: 2155 OS: Linux Version: Recent tournament version One Elder of Players Location: Germany |
Posted at:
2017-08-26, 14:23 UTC+2.0
"Not a perfect choice" Wanted to save the world, then I got widetracked
Top
Quote
|
|
Tibor Topic Opener
Joined:
2009-03-23, 23:24 UTC+1.0
Posts: 1377 One Elder of Players Location: Slovakia |
Posted at:
2017-08-26, 19:29 UTC+2.0
Results of Nordfriese's training has not been merged to trunk yet.
Top
Quote
|
hessenfarmer
Joined:
2014-12-11, 23:16 UTC+1.0
Posts: 2867 One Elder of Players Location: Bavaria |
Posted at:
2017-08-27, 23:33 UTC+2.0
I just played my new scenario against the newest code changes (8434) and Nordfrieses latest Training values. That was quite a new experience on how to play widelands. Ai with babarians performed damn good as I have never seen the Ai performing. Will have to check whether the empire 03 scenario is still fair enough for the real player. I am really deeply impressed by your work Tibor. That will definitly bring Widelands to a new level. (including the risk of frustration perhaps). I would be glad to hear from king_of_nowhere if his challenge maps still will be winnable with new AI.
Top
Quote
|
kaputtnik
Joined:
2013-02-18, 20:48 UTC+1.0
Posts: 2701 OS: Archlinux Version: current master One Elder of Players Location: Germany |
Posted at:
2017-08-28, 08:15 UTC+2.0
Don't know how the different ai-levels are implemented, but it should be considered to use a weaker ai as default
Top
Quote
|
