Topic: wood is too hard too produce
|
megalive Topic Opener
Joined:
2010-04-12, 22:16 UTC+2.0
Posts: 12  Pry about Widelands |
Posted at:
2010-04-12, 22:21 UTC+2.0
Hi, In settlers 2 the wood was kinda easy too produce (ie a few woodcutters one or two foresters and at least 2 wood processing plants) in that way you had some nice amount of wood too build your empire. here you need too build a lot more woodcutters and it stays going kinda slowly .... mayeb add a multiplie'er plant so it uses planks instead of whole trees ;-). I like the idea about the different types of wood (hardend and normal) :). 
Top
Quote
|
|
SirVer
Joined:
2009-02-19, 15:18 UTC+1.0
Posts: 1442  One Elder of Players Location: Germany - Munich |
Posted at:
2010-04-13, 10:35 UTC+2.0
welcome to the forums. this is not s2, if you want to play it, take a look at the s25rttr project. we do things differently.
Top
Quote
|
|
megalive Topic Opener
Joined:
2010-04-12, 22:16 UTC+2.0
Posts: 12 Pry about Widelands |
Posted at:
2010-04-13, 16:32 UTC+2.0
What i was trying too explain here is the fact that a woodcutter even with a single forester next too it is not producing a lot of wood. So you need too build many of them. In the other case the food chain is working a lot quicker. with mines in the end. So with my metalworker while expending my territory had plenty metal and no wood at all. Maybe it is intended but balancing the wood production part will help in the beginning. This just what i noticed from it. Maybe i had the complete wrong balance ...
Top
Quote
|
|
ixprefect
Joined:
2009-02-27, 14:28 UTC+1.0
Posts: 367  Tribe Member |
Posted at:
2010-04-13, 17:13 UTC+2.0
I think it depends on the tribe you're playing. As barbarians, I try to get at least 8 woodcutters + rangers up and running as quickly as possible, if possible even more than that (though then also metalworks are required to create more axes). On the other hand, one or two wood hardeners are usually enough. So yes, if you're coming from S2, that's unusual. That doesn't mean it's bad, though. The food chain for barbarians only feels fast to me as long as you don't need bread and beer. Once you need bread and beer, it's starting to suck up a lot of resources.
Top
Quote
|
king_of_nowhere
Joined:
2014-09-15, 18:35 UTC+2.0
Posts: 1668 One Elder of Players |
Posted at:
2016-07-08, 13:35 UTC+2.0
this feels like a spambot. delete please.
Edited:
2016-07-10, 03:38 UTC+2.0
Top
Quote
|
|
einstein13
Joined:
2013-07-29, 00:01 UTC+2.0
Posts: 1116 One Elder of Players Location: Poland |
Posted at:
2016-07-09, 01:05 UTC+2.0
As I remember, in old Settlers2 the balance was (about) 2 woodcutters for 1 ranger. Here is opposite: 2 rangers for 1 woodcutter. Of course there are many other factors (type of terrain, buildings density nearby, ...), but it works well in most of cases. An no- the balance is not wrong. It's just different einstein13
Top
Quote
|
toptopple
Joined:
2013-10-30, 08:11 UTC+1.0
Posts: 156  At home in WL-forums |
Posted at:
2016-07-09, 09:00 UTC+2.0
What I fully agree with is that Wideland's Forester is not the pride of the game! If someone can point me to the C code package where "find location" is located for the Forester, I would venture to have a look at it. Perhaps I can work with somebody to implement an improve worker behaviour. Might require a separate script command implementation for the Forester.
Top
Quote
|
kaputtnik
Joined:
2013-02-18, 20:48 UTC+1.0
Posts: 2683 OS: Archlinux Version: current master One Elder of Players Location: Germany |
Posted at:
2016-07-09, 10:17 UTC+2.0
Done. To the others: There is no need to excavate a 6 years old thread
Top
Quote
|
|
Tibor
Joined:
2009-03-23, 23:24 UTC+1.0
Posts: 1377 One Elder of Players Location: Slovakia |
Posted at:
2016-07-09, 13:56 UTC+2.0
Well I am not familiar with this parts of code, but you can start with function Worker::run_findspace() ....
Top
Quote
|
|
toptopple
Joined:
2013-10-30, 08:11 UTC+1.0
Posts: 156 At home in WL-forums |
Posted at:
2016-07-10, 10:00 UTC+2.0
@Tibor: Can you name me the file path?
Top
Quote
|
