Important Dates

Currently Online

Latest Posts

Topic: new tribe: amazons

hessenfarmer
Avatar
Joined: 2014-12-11, 23:16
Posts: 1162
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: Bavaria
Posted at: 2020-02-20, 08:08

hi,
1) is unrelated to amazons
2) -1 from me as another step would complicate the issue even further, and not having this little challenge to micromanage would make them to easy to play.


Top Quote
the-x
Avatar
Joined: 2019-01-19, 13:23
Posts: 339
Ranking
Tribe Member
Posted at: 2020-02-20, 11:57

Ok, so do you have any Solutions to the problem of micromagement?


Top Quote
hessenfarmer
Avatar
Joined: 2014-12-11, 23:16
Posts: 1162
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: Bavaria
Posted at: 2020-02-20, 12:24

the-x wrote:

Ok, so do you have any Solutions to the problem of micromagement?

No, as I don't have a problem with it.


Top Quote
the-x
Avatar
Joined: 2019-01-19, 13:23
Posts: 339
Ranking
Tribe Member
Posted at: 2020-02-20, 12:32

You do have if you have the same version as everyone else has


Top Quote
WorldSavior
Avatar
Joined: 2016-10-15, 04:10
Posts: 1492
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: North of Germany
Posted at: 2020-02-20, 13:49

The solution would be to the fix the bug that the "kick out" can be ignored.

As I told somewhere else, it would be a nice feature if the "kick out" would kick out by default the worker which is at the top at the list if you don't manually chose another worker in the list. (Which means for buildings with only one worker that you simply have to click the button instead of choosing the worker first.) Another feature could be that one could select several workers by klick-and-swipe or crtl+a or whatever.

This is indeed amazon-related.

As I'm already writing here: Every tribe has a medium military building with 9 conquer radius, so at least the observation tower should have 9 instead of 8.


“It's a threat to our planet to believe that someone else will save it.” - Robert Swan

Top Quote
king_of_nowhere
Avatar
Joined: 2014-09-15, 18:35
Posts: 1526
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Posted at: 2020-02-20, 19:40

WorldSavior wrote:

As I'm already writing here: Every tribe has a medium military building with 9 conquer radius, so at least the observation tower should have 9 instead of 8.

i thought they had one. if they don't, then they need one indeed.


Top Quote
WorldSavior
Avatar
Joined: 2016-10-15, 04:10
Posts: 1492
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: North of Germany
Posted at: 2020-02-20, 23:22

Then it should be just the observation tower in my opinion. It will be a novelty in the game to have a tower which gains conquer radius if you enhance it.


“It's a threat to our planet to believe that someone else will save it.” - Robert Swan

Top Quote
WorldSavior
Avatar
Joined: 2016-10-15, 04:10
Posts: 1492
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Location: North of Germany
Posted at: 2020-02-28, 00:26

king_of_nowhere wrote:

and virtually anyone else is weaker than me to the point that i'd feel a bully to ask them to play.

Some players like it to play against opponents which are much stronger than them - they don't care about losing and appreciate that they can learn something. Would you also feel like a bully if you'd ask them to play then?

by now, you're probably thinking i should see a psychologist face-shock.png

No, your post is sane, don't worry face-wink.png

For example I can understand that you dislike playing matches with less than 50% win chance for you, I also dislike those.


“It's a threat to our planet to believe that someone else will save it.” - Robert Swan

Top Quote
king_of_nowhere
Avatar
Joined: 2014-09-15, 18:35
Posts: 1526
Ranking
One Elder of Players
Posted at: 2020-02-28, 03:22

WorldSavior wrote:

For example I can understand that you dislike playing matches with less than 50% win chance for you, I also dislike those.

not so drastic. i don't mind a stronger opponent, as long as i can feel like i have an actual chance. so, make it 25% win chance for me


Top Quote
the-x
Avatar
Joined: 2019-01-19, 13:23
Posts: 339
Ranking
Tribe Member
Posted at: 2020-02-28, 19:38

WorldSavior wrote:

king_of_nowhere wrote:

by now, you're probably thinking i should see a psychologist face-shock.png

No, your post is sane, don't worry face-wink.png

For example I can understand that you dislike playing matches with less than 50% win chance for you, I also dislike those.

Since I like to play matches where I have less than 50% win chance it is the perfect Solution, isnt it xD


Top Quote