Topic: Destroying a military site which is under attack
mxb2001
Joined: 2019-05-20, 17:49
Posts: 251 OS: Linux Version: 1.1  Tribe Member Location: The land of the thirsty spider |
Posted at: 2020-01-18, 00:24
Perhaps change the basic game mechanics so that mil. buildings can't be conquered. That feature makes it very easy to rampage over a defender. -- 
Top
Quote
|
Nordfriese
Joined: 2017-01-17, 17:07
Posts: 1950 OS: Debian Testing Version: Latest master  One Elder of Players Location: 0x55555d3a34c0 |
Posted at: 2020-01-18, 09:16
I like the system the way it is and don´t see the need to change it so drastically.
Top
Quote
|
WorldSavior
Joined: 2016-10-15, 03:10
Posts: 2094 OS: Linux Version: Recent tournament version One Elder of Players Location: Germany |
Posted at: 2020-01-18, 18:25
Especially when the defender is the AI. And then you have to manage all those tiny buildings which you conquer from the AI, that can be annoying... Wanted to save the world, then I got widetracked
Top
Quote
|
|
Nordfriese
Joined: 2017-01-17, 17:07
Posts: 1950 OS: Debian Testing Version: Latest master One Elder of Players Location: 0x55555d3a34c0 |
Posted at: 2020-01-19, 11:05
This is a very nice feature which is disliked by many people. Option time? Let's have an option "conquer defeated milsites" in the game setup screen so people can choose whether they want this or not (in MP games, this would be selected by the host for all players) Edited: 2020-01-19, 11:05
Top
Quote
|
|
WorldSavior
Joined: 2016-10-15, 03:10
Posts: 2094 OS: Linux Version: Recent tournament version One Elder of Players Location: Germany |
Posted at: 2020-01-19, 14:23
Very good idea. Especially AI matches will make much more sense thanks to this option I'd vote for: Default is "no conquering". Wanted to save the world, then I got widetracked
Top
Quote
|
stonerl
Joined: 2018-07-29, 23:03
Posts: 327 Tribe Member |
Posted at: 2020-01-21, 15:33
So instead of conquering, the building would be destroyed?
Top
Quote
|
|
stonerl
Joined: 2018-07-29, 23:03
Posts: 327 Tribe Member |
Posted at: 2020-01-21, 15:36
Regarding whether an attacked building should be allowed to be destroyed or dismantle by the defender, I'll set up a poll after the current one is closed.
Top
Quote
|
kaputtnik
Joined: 2013-02-18, 19:48
Posts: 2439 OS: Archlinux Version: current master One Elder of Players Location: Germany |
Posted at: 2020-01-21, 15:52
Please add an option 'Don't know' or 'abstinent for voting' if you do so Fight simulator for Widelands:
Top
Quote
|
|
WorldSavior
Joined: 2016-10-15, 03:10
Posts: 2094 OS: Linux Version: Recent tournament version One Elder of Players Location: Germany |
Posted at: 2020-01-24, 20:27
Dismantled, so one doesn't have to do it.
Well, what would be the point of such a poll if there will be a new option which makes it impossible to conquer buildings? Wanted to save the world, then I got widetracked
Top
Quote
|
hessenfarmer
Joined: 2014-12-11, 22:16
Posts: 2648 One Elder of Players Location: Bavaria |
Posted at: 2020-01-25, 00:26
Basically I am with our former chieftain SirVer, that having an option is only the easy way out of a discussion and we should avoid having to many options. In the recent past we violated his memory in this particular area quite often.
Top
Quote
|
